Identity Access Management – techyengineer.com

Table of Contents

Understand Concepts: Secure Tokens, Identity Provider (IdP), and Relying Party

These three concepts — Secure Tokens , Identity Provider (IdP) , and Relying Party — form the core of modern identity and access management (IAM) systems. They are especially important in federated identity , Single Sign-On (SSO) , and OAuth/OpenID Connect-based architectures .

Let’s break them down one by one.

🔐 1. Secure Tokens

✅ Definition:

A secure token is a piece of data that represents a user’s identity and permissions after they’ve been authenticated. It is issued by an Identity Provider (IdP) and consumed by a Relying Party to grant access without re-authenticating the user.

🧱 Types of Secure Tokens:

Token Type	Description	Example Use Case
SAML Assertion	XML-based token used in SAML protocol	Enterprise SSO to apps like Salesforce
JWT (JSON Web Token)	Compact, signed JSON token used in OAuth/OIDC	Modern web and mobile apps
OAuth Access Token	Short-lived token granting access to APIs	API calls from a mobile app
Refresh Token	Long-lived token used to obtain new access tokens	Maintaining login state across sessions

🔒 Characteristics of Secure Tokens:

Signed : To ensure integrity and prevent tampering.
Encrypted : To protect sensitive data in transit or at rest.
Time-limited : Usually short-lived for security (e.g., 5–60 minutes).
Scoped/Claimed : Contains claims or scopes indicating what the user is allowed to do.

🔍 Example JWT Claims:

json

{

“iss”: “https://login.example.com “,

“exp”: 1717649200,

“iat”: 1717645600,

“sub”: “1234567890”,

“name”: “John Doe”,

“email”: “john.doe@example.com”,

“roles”: [“user”, “admin”]

}

🧑‍💼 2. Identity Provider (IdP)

✅ Definition:

An Identity Provider (IdP) is a system that authenticates users and issues secure tokens containing their identity information. It acts as the trusted source of identity in federated environments.

🧩 Key Responsibilities:

Authenticating users (via password, MFA, biometrics, etc.)
Issuing secure tokens (SAML, JWT, OAuth tokens)
Managing user identities (creation, roles, deactivation)
Supporting federation protocols (SAML, OIDC, OAuth)

🏢 Common IdPs:

IdP	Type	Features
Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD)	Cloud	Seamless integration with Microsoft ecosystem
Okta	Cloud	Multi-cloud support, B2B/B2C
Auth0	Cloud	Developer-focused, B2C use cases
Google Workspace	Cloud	G Suite users
Ping Identity	On-prem/cloud	Enterprise-grade
Keycloak	Self-hosted	Open-source, customizable
ForgeRock	On-prem/cloud	Highly secure, compliance-ready

🛡️ 3. Relying Party (RP)

✅ Definition:

A Relying Party (RP) is a system or application that trusts the Identity Provider and uses the secure token it issues to grant access to resources without authenticating the user itself.

Also known as a Service Provider (SP) in SAML terminology.

🧩 Key Responsibilities:

Redirecting users to the IdP for authentication
Receiving and validating secure tokens
Granting access based on the token contents
Optionally refreshing tokens when expired

📦 Examples of Relying Parties:

RP	Description
Salesforce	Accepts SAML tokens from Azure AD or Okta
AWS Console / AWS IAM	Uses SAML or OIDC tokens for federated access
Mobile App	Uses OAuth tokens issued by Google or Auth0
Internal Web App	Validates JWT tokens issued by your own IdP
API Gateway	Validates OAuth access tokens before allowing API calls

🔄 The Flow: How They Work Together

Here’s how these components interact in a typical OAuth 2.0 + OpenID Connect (OIDC) flow:

User wants to access an app (the Relying Party).
App redirects user to the Identity Provider (IdP).
User logs in at the IdP.
IdP authenticates user and issues a secure token (e.g., JWT).
Token is sent back to the Relying Party.
Relying Party validates the token and grants access.

🧠 Visual Summary

[User]

↓

[Relying Party (RP)]

↓ (Redirect to authenticate)

[Identity Provider (IdP)]

↓ (Authenticates user)

[Secure Token Issued]

↓ (Sent back to RP)

[Relying Party Validates Token → Grants Access]

📊 Comparison Table

Concept	Role	Example	Security Focus
Secure Token	Carries identity & permissions	JWT, SAML Assertion, OAuth Token	Signed/encrypted, time-bound
Identity Provider (IdP)	Authenticates users and issues tokens	Azure AD, Okta, Auth0	Strong auth, MFA, audit logs
Relying Party (RP)	Trusts token and grants access	Web app, mobile app, API	Token validation, session management

🎯 When to Use These Concepts

Scenario	Used Components
Employee logs into internal portal using company credentials	IdP (Active Directory), Relying Party (portal), Secure Token (Kerberos/LDAP)
User logs into a mobile app using Google account	IdP (Google), Relying Party (app), Secure Token (OAuth/JWT)
Partner accesses your cloud app securely	IdP (Okta), Relying Party (your app), Secure Token (SAML/OIDC)
Admin accesses AWS using corporate credentials	IdP (Azure AD), Relying Party (AWS), Secure Token (SAML)

✅ Summary

Concept	Purpose	Protocol Example
Secure Token	Represents identity and permissions	JWT, SAML, OAuth Token
Identity Provider (IdP)	Authenticates users and issues tokens	Azure AD, Okta, Auth0
Relying Party (RP)	Trusts token and grants access	Web apps, mobile apps, APIs

What is Single Sign-On (SSO) and How It Works?

🔐 Definition:

Single Sign-On (SSO) is an authentication mechanism that allows a user to log in once with a single set of credentials (such as username and password) and gain access to multiple applications, systems, or services without being prompted to log in again.

It improves both user experience and security , especially in environments where users interact with multiple platforms daily.

🧠 Core Concept: One Login, Many Applications

Imagine you’re at work and need to use:

Microsoft 365
Salesforce
Google Workspace
Internal HR portal

With SSO, you log in once , and after that, you can access all these applications without re-entering your credentials — because they trust the same identity provider.

🧱 Key Components of SSO

Component	Description
User	The person trying to access one or more applications
Service Provider (SP)	The application or system the user wants to access
Identity Provider (IdP)	The trusted system that authenticates the user and issues tokens

💡 In SSO, the IdP does the authentication , and the SP trusts the IdP’s decision .

⚙️ How SSO Works – Step-by-Step Flow

Let’s walk through a typical web-based SSO flow using SAML or OpenID Connect (OIDC) :

User tries to access an application (e.g., Salesforce).
Application (Service Provider) redirects the user to the Identity Provider (IdP).
User logs in at the IdP (e.g., Azure AD or Okta).
IdP verifies credentials and generates a secure token (SAML assertion or JWT).
Token is sent back to the Service Provider.
Service Provider validates the token and grants access.
User now accesses other integrated apps without logging in again.

🔄 Real-Time Example: Logging into Multiple Apps with One Login

You open your browser and go to Outlook.com .

You enter your company email and password (managed by Azure AD ).

After login, you click on Teams , and it opens instantly.

Then you go to Salesforce , and it also logs you in automatically.

This seamless experience is made possible by SSO .

🛠️ Common Protocols Used for SSO

Protocol	Description	Use Case
SAML (Security Assertion Markup Language)	XML-based protocol used mainly for enterprise web apps	Salesforce, Workday, AWS
OpenID Connect (OIDC)	Identity layer over OAuth 2.0; uses JSON tokens (JWT)	Modern web and mobile apps
OAuth 2.0	Authorization framework (often used with OIDC for identity)	APIs, third-party integrations
Kerberos	Network authentication protocol (used internally in Windows domains)	On-premises enterprise networks
LDAP / Active Directory	Not true SSO but often used for centralized authentication	Local network login

✅ Benefits of SSO

Benefit	Explanation
Improved User Experience	No need to remember and type multiple passwords
Increased Productivity	Less time spent logging in means more time working
Enhanced Security	Encourages use of strong passwords and supports MFA
Centralized Access Control	Admins manage access from a single place
Audit & Compliance	Easier to track who accessed what and when
Reduced IT Helpdesk Load	Fewer password reset requests

⚠️ Limitations & Risks

Risk	Mitigation
Single Point of Failure	Ensure high availability and backup IdPs
Credential Theft	Enforce Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
Session Hijacking	Use encrypted communication (HTTPS), short-lived tokens
Overprivileged Access	Implement role-based access control (RBAC)
Complex Setup	Choose IdPs with easy integration tools and support

📌 Real-World Examples

1. Enterprise SSO with Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD)

Employees sign in once to their corporate account and get instant access to:

Outlook

Teams

SharePoint

Third-party apps like Zoom or Dropbox

2. Consumer SSO with Google or Facebook

You visit a new website and choose “Sign in with Google” — no need to create a new account.

3. Cloud Infrastructure SSO with AWS IAM

Developers use their corporate credentials (via SAML) to access AWS Console without needing separate AWS accounts.

🧩 Types of SSO Solutions

Type	Description	Example
Web SSO	For browser-based apps using SAML/OIDC	Salesforce, G Suite
Desktop SSO	For local OS login and internal apps	Windows + Active Directory
Mobile SSO	For mobile apps using OAuth/JWT	Mobile banking apps
Federated SSO	Across organizations using trust relationships	Partner portals, cloud services

📊 Summary Table

Concept	Description
What is SSO?	A method that lets users access multiple apps with one login
How it works	IdP authenticates user and sends token to SP
Protocols used	SAML, OIDC, OAuth, Kerberos
Benefits	Better UX, security, productivity, compliance
Risks	Credential theft, single point of failure
Best Practices	Use MFA, monitor access, integrate with IAM

What is SAML and How It Works

🔐 Definition:

SAML (Security Assertion Markup Language) is an XML-based open standard used for Single Sign-On (SSO) across different security domains.

It allows secure exchange of user authentication and authorization data between an Identity Provider (IdP) and a Service Provider (SP) — enabling users to log in once and access multiple applications without re-entering credentials.

🧠 Core Concept: Federated Identity via XML Tokens

SAML enables federated identity , meaning:

A user authenticates with one trusted system (the IdP),
And uses that authentication to access other systems (SPs) that trust the IdP.

This is widely used in enterprise environments for SSO into web applications like:

Salesforce
Google Workspace
Microsoft 365
AWS Console
Workday

🧱 Key Components in SAML Architecture

Component	Description
User (Principal)	The person trying to access a service
Service Provider (SP)	The application or system the user wants to access
Identity Provider (IdP)	The trusted system that authenticates the user

💡 Think of the IdP as the bouncer at the door , and the SP as the club inside . Once you’re verified by the bouncer, you can enter any room (application) that trusts them.

⚙️ How SAML Works – Step-by-Step Flow

Here’s how a typical SAML-based Single Sign-On (SSO) works:

User tries to access a Service Provider (e.g., Salesforce).
SP redirects the user to the Identity Provider (e.g., Azure AD or Okta).
User logs in at the IdP.
IdP creates a SAML assertion (a signed XML document containing user identity and attributes).
SAML assertion is sent back to the SP (via browser redirect or POST).
SP validates the SAML assertion and grants access to the user.
User can now access other SPs that trust the same IdP, without re-authenticating.

📋 Example SAML Assertion (Simplified)

xml

<saml:Assertion xmlns:saml=”urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion” ID=”_123456″>

<saml:Issuer>https://login.example.com </saml:Issuer>

<saml:Subject>

<saml:NameID Format=”urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:nameid-format:emailAddress”>john.doe@example.com</saml:NameID>

<saml:SubjectConfirmation Method=”urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:cm:bearer”/>

</saml:Subject>

<saml:AttributeStatement>

<saml:Attribute Name=”role”>

<saml:AttributeValue>admin</saml:AttributeValue>

</saml:Attribute>

</saml:AttributeStatement>

</saml:Assertion>

This XML snippet tells the SP:

Who the user is (john.doe@example.com)

What role they have (admin)

That it was issued by a trusted IdP (login.example.com)

🔄 Common SAML Bindings (Communication Methods)

Binding Type	Description	Use Case
HTTP Redirect	Encodes SAML request/response in URL parameters	Used for initial login requests
HTTP POST	Sends SAML data in form post body	Used to send assertions securely
Artifact	Exchanges a small token (“artifact”) and retrieves full message later	For secure communication where direct transfer isn’t feasible
SOAP	Used for back-channel communication	Mostly for advanced use cases like logout or attribute queries

✅ Benefits of SAML

Benefit	Explanation
Single Sign-On (SSO)	One login for multiple apps
Improved Security	Reduces password fatigue and supports MFA
Centralized Identity Management	IdP manages user identities and roles
Compliance Ready	Supports regulatory standards like HIPAA, GDPR
Scalable Across Domains	Enables secure collaboration between organizations

⚠️ Limitations of SAML

Limitation	Reason
Complex XML format	Harder to debug and parse compared to JSON
Limited mobile support	Better suited for browser-based apps
No built-in API access control	OAuth/OpenID Connect are better for APIs
Session management challenges	Logout from all SPs requires SAML Single Logout (SLO), which is not always implemented well

📌 Real-World Examples

1. Enterprise SSO with Active Directory Federation Services (AD FS)

Employees log in to Windows using their corporate credentials. They access internal apps and external services like Office 365 or Salesforce without re-entering passwords.

2. Cloud App Access via Okta or Azure AD

A user logs into the Okta dashboard and accesses:

Google Workspace

AWS

Zoom All via SAML-based SSO.

3. Partner Access

A vendor needs access to your company’s Salesforce instance. Instead of creating a separate account, they authenticate through their own IdP, and SAML handles the trust.

🧩 SAML vs OAuth/OpenID Connect

Feature	SAML	OAuth 2.0 / OpenID Connect (OIDC)
Primary Use Case	Web app SSO	Mobile/web apps, APIs
Data Format	XML	JSON
Protocol Type	Authentication + Authorization	Authorization (OIDC adds identity)
Mobile Friendly	❌ Not ideal	✅ Yes
API Integration	❌ Limited	✅ Strong
Logout Support	✅ With SLO	✅ Easy
Modern Adoption	Legacy/enterprise	Modern/cloud-first

📊 Summary Table

Concept	Description
What is SAML?	XML-based protocol for secure identity exchange
Purpose	Enable SSO across trusted domains
Main Components	IdP, SP, User
How it works	User → SP → IdP → SAML Token → SP grants access
Benefits	SSO, centralized auth, compliance-ready
Limitations	Complex, XML-heavy, limited mobile/API support
Common Tools	Azure AD, Okta, ADFS, Ping Identity, Shibboleth

What is OAuth and How Does It Work?

🔐 Definition:

OAuth (Open Authorization) is an open-standard authorization protocol that allows applications to securely access resources on behalf of a user , without the user sharing their credentials.

It enables third-party services to access user data from another service , with the user’s permission, using tokens instead of passwords .

OAuth is widely used in modern web and mobile applications for:

Social login
API access
Single Sign-On (SSO)
Third-party integrations

📌 Note: OAuth is about authorization , not authentication. Authentication verifies who you are; authorization determines what you’re allowed to do.

🧠 Core Concept: Token-Based Delegation

OAuth allows a user to grant a client application (like a mobile app or website) limited access to a resource server (like Google Drive or Twitter API), through a token , without exposing their credentials.

This is how apps like Canva , Buffer , or IFTTT can access your Google Drive , Twitter account , or Dropbox files — all via OAuth tokens .

⚙️ Key Components in OAuth 2.0 Flow

Component	Description
Resource Owner	The user who owns the data (e.g., you)
Client Application	The app requesting access (e.g., Canva)
Authorization Server	Issues access tokens after user grants permission (e.g., Google OAuth server)
Resource Server	Hosts the protected data (e.g., Google Drive API)

🔄 OAuth 2.0 Flows (Grant Types)

OAuth 2.0 defines several grant types depending on the use case. Here are the most common ones:

1. Authorization Code Flow (Most Common)

Used by web and mobile apps
Involves redirecting the user to the authorization server
Secure because token is sent directly to the backend

🔁 Flow Steps:

User clicks “Login with Google”
App redirects user to Google’s authorization server
User logs in and approves access
Google sends authorization code back to app
App exchanges code for access token at the token endpoint
App uses token to access user data (e.g., profile info)

2. Implicit Flow

Older flow used by browser-based apps (SPA) where there’s no backend
Token is returned directly to the browser
Less secure than Authorization Code Flow

3. Client Credentials Flow

Used when one service needs to access another service without a user
For server-to-server communication
Example: Microservices accessing internal APIs

4. Password Grant Flow

Allows client to send username and password directly to get a token
Not recommended unless absolutely necessary
Often used in legacy systems

5. Refresh Token Flow

Used to obtain a new access token once it expires
Avoids asking the user to re-authenticate every time
Refresh tokens are long-lived and must be stored securely

📋 Example: OAuth 2.0 Authorization Code Flow

Let’s say you want to use your Google Photos in a third-party app called MyPhotoEditor.com .

Step-by-step:

You click “Import from Google” in MyPhotoEditor.
You’re redirected to Google’s OAuth consent screen .
You log into Google (if not already logged in).
You approve access to your photos.
Google sends a short-lived authorization code back to MyPhotoEditor.
MyPhotoEditor exchanges this code for an access token from Google’s token server.
MyPhotoEditor now uses the token to fetch your photos via the Google Photos API.

🛡️ OAuth Tokens

Token Type	Purpose	Lifespan
Access Token	Grants temporary access to a resource	Short-lived (minutes to hours)
Refresh Token	Used to get a new access token when expired	Long-lived (days to months)
ID Token	Contains user identity information (used in OpenID Connect)	Short-lived

Tokens are often encoded as JWTs (JSON Web Tokens) for easy parsing and validation.

✅ Benefits of OAuth

Benefit	Explanation
Improved Security	No need to share passwords with third parties
User Control	Users decide what data to share and revoke access anytime
Scalability	Enables secure integration between apps and services
Flexibility	Supports multiple flows for different use cases (web, mobile, backend)
Standardized	Widely adopted across platforms (Google, Facebook, GitHub, etc.)

⚠️ Risks & Best Practices

Risk	Best Practice
Token leakage	Use HTTPS, short-lived tokens, and refresh token rotation
CSRF attacks	Use`state`parameter to prevent cross-site request forgery
Phishing attacks	Validate redirect URIs and ensure proper user consent
Overprivileged access	Request only necessary scopes
Lack of revocation	Implement token revocation mechanisms

📌 Real-World Examples

Use Case	Description
“Login with Google/Facebook”	OAuth is used to authenticate users without creating a new account
Connecting Apps in Zapier/IFTTT	OAuth tokens allow services to talk securely without exposing passwords
Mobile App Accessing Backend API	Mobile app gets a token to access user-specific data from your backend
Serverless Functions Calling APIs	Uses Client Credentials Flow to securely access external services

🧩 OAuth vs OpenID Connect (OIDC)

Feature	OAuth 2.0	OpenID Connect (OIDC)
Purpose	Authorization (access control)	Identity + OAuth
Scope	Defines what access is granted	Adds identity layer (who the user is)
ID Token	❌ Not included	✅ Yes (JWT format)
Authentication Support	❌ Only authorization	✅ Yes
Use Case	API access, delegated access	User login, SSO, identity federation

OIDC is built on top of OAuth 2.0 , adding identity features like user authentication and ID tokens.

📊 Summary Table

Concept	Description
What is OAuth?	An open standard for delegated authorization
Main Use Cases	Social login, API access, third-party integrations
Key Components	Resource Owner, Client, Authorization Server, Resource Server
Common Flow	Authorization Code Flow
Tokens Used	Access Token, Refresh Token, ID Token (in OIDC)
Security Features	Scopes, state parameter, HTTPS, short-lived tokens
Best Practices	Use HTTPS, short-lived tokens, validate redirect URIs

What is OpenID Connect (OIDC)?

🔐 Definition:

OpenID Connect (OIDC) is an identity layer built on top of the OAuth 2.0 protocol that enables clients to verify the identity of an end-user based on the authentication performed by an Authorization Server , as well as to obtain basic profile information about the end-user in an interoperable and REST-like manner.

In simpler terms, OIDC allows users to log in to applications using their existing accounts (like Google, Facebook, or corporate credentials) — providing a secure, standardized way to implement Single Sign-On (SSO) across web, mobile, and API-based systems.

🧠 Core Concept: Authentication + OAuth

Feature	Description
OAuth 2.0	Handles authorization — what you can access
OpenID Connect (OIDC)	Adds identity — who you are

OIDC doesn’t replace OAuth; it enhances it with user identity features .

⚙️ Key Components of OIDC

Component	Description
End-User / Resource Owner	The person trying to authenticate
Client	The application requesting authentication
OpenID Provider (OP)	The Authorization Server that authenticates the user and issues tokens
UserInfo Endpoint	An API endpoint where the client can get more details about the authenticated user

🔄 How OpenID Connect Works – Step-by-Step Flow

Here’s how OIDC works in a typical web app login scenario using the Authorization Code Flow :

User clicks “Login with Google” or similar button
App redirects user to the OpenID Provider (e.g., Google or Okta)
User logs in at the OP
User grants permission to share identity with the app
OP returns an authorization code to the app
App exchanges code for an access token and an ID token
App validates ID token (JWT format) and logs the user in
Optionally, app calls UserInfo endpoint to fetch additional user info

📋 Example ID Token (JWT Format)

json

{

“iss”: “https://accounts.google.com “,

“sub”: “117982938712345678901”,

“email”: “john.doe@gmail.com”,

“email_verified”: true,

“name”: “John Doe”,

“given_name”: “John”,

“family_name”: “Doe”,

“picture”: “https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/… “,

“iat”: 1717029200,

“exp”: 1717032800

}

This JSON Web Token (JWT) tells the app:

Who the user is (email, name)

When the token was issued and expires

Which provider issued it (iss)

Unique user identifier (sub)

🛡️ Key Features of OIDC

Feature	Description
Single Sign-On (SSO)	Users log in once and access multiple apps
Supports Multiple Flows	Authorization Code, Implicit, Hybrid flows
Standardized Claims	Predefined attributes like name, email, phone number
UserInfo Endpoint	RESTful API to retrieve additional user data
Logout Support	Centralized logout via`end_session_endpoint`
Scopes	`openid`,`profile`,`email`,`address`, etc.
Stateless & RESTful	Designed for modern web and mobile apps

🧩 Common Use Cases

Use Case	Description
Social Login	Allow users to sign in using Google, Facebook, GitHub, etc.
Enterprise SSO	Employees use company credentials (Azure AD, Okta) to access internal and external apps
Customer Identity Management	B2C scenarios where customers use social or self-registered accounts
Mobile App Authentication	Secure login flow for iOS/Android apps using third-party identity providers
API Security	Combine OIDC with OAuth 2.0 to protect backend APIs

🔄 OIDC vs OAuth 2.0 Comparison

Feature	OAuth 2.0	OpenID Connect (OIDC)
Primary Purpose	Authorization (what you can do)	Authentication + OAuth (who you are + what you can do)
ID Token	❌ Not available	✅ Yes (JWT format)
UserInfo Endpoint	❌ Not standard	✅ Yes
Authentication Support	❌ No	✅ Yes
Use Case	API access, delegated permissions	User login, SSO, identity federation
Protocols Used	Pure OAuth	OAuth + extensions for identity

🧪 Popular OpenID Providers

Provider	Type	Notes
Google Identity Platform	Cloud	Supports social login
Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD)	Cloud	Enterprise-grade IdP
Okta	Cloud	Multi-cloud and hybrid support
Auth0	Cloud	Developer-focused, B2C support
Keycloak	Self-hosted	Open-source IAM solution
Ping Identity	On-prem/cloud	Large enterprise deployments
ForgeRock	On-prem/cloud	Highly customizable, compliance-ready

📊 Summary Table

Concept	Description
What is OIDC?	Identity layer over OAuth 2.0
Purpose	Enable secure user authentication and SSO
Core Components	ID Token, UserInfo Endpoint, Scopes
Main Flows	Authorization Code, Implicit, Hybrid
Token Format	JWT (JSON Web Token)
Benefits	SSO, centralized identity, developer-friendly
Best Practices	Use HTTPS, validate ID tokens, refresh token rotation

✅ Best Practices for Using OIDC

Practice	Description
Always Validate ID Tokens	Check issuer, expiration, signature, and audience
Use HTTPS Everywhere	Prevent token interception
Use Short-Lived Tokens	Reduce risk of token misuse
Implement Refresh Token Rotation	Improve security for long-lived sessions
Protect Redirect URIs	Prevent open redirect vulnerabilities
Log Out Properly	Use the`end_session_endpoint`to invalidate tokens globally

SAML vs OpenID Connect (OIDC) vs OAuth 2.0: A Clear Comparison

These three standards — SAML , OAuth 2.0 , and OpenID Connect (OIDC) — are central to modern identity and access management (IAM) systems.

While they’re often used together, they serve different purposes :

Standard	Primary Purpose	Type	Data Format	Common Use
SAML	Federated identity and SSO	Authentication + Authorization	XML	Enterprise apps (Salesforce, Office 365)
OAuth 2.0	Delegated authorization	Authorization only	Token-based (no format specified)	API access, third-party integrations
OpenID Connect (OIDC)	Identity layer on top of OAuth	Authentication + Authorization	JSON (JWT)	Modern web/mobile apps, B2C, SSO

🔍 Overview of Each

1. SAML (Security Assertion Markup Language)

XML-based standard for exchanging authentication and authorization data.
Used primarily in enterprise environments for Single Sign-On (SSO) .
Works well with web applications like Salesforce, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365.

📌 Example: Logging into your company’s Active Directory and accessing multiple internal and external apps without re-entering credentials.

2. OAuth 2.0 (Open Authorization)

Authorization protocol that allows apps to access resources on behalf of a user.
Does not provide authentication by itself — it focuses on delegated access .
Tokens are typically short-lived and issued after user consent.

📌 Example: Giving Canva permission to access your Google Drive files.

3. OpenID Connect (OIDC)

Built on top of OAuth 2.0 , adds an identity layer .
Enables user authentication by returning an ID token (a JWT).
Designed for modern web and mobile apps , supports APIs and cloud-native architectures.

📌 Example: Clicking “Sign in with Google” on a mobile app or website.

🧠 Core Differences

Feature	SAML	OAuth 2.0	OpenID Connect (OIDC)
Primary Use Case	Web SSO in enterprise environments	Delegated access (APIs, third-party apps)	User authentication (SSO, mobile/web apps)
Authentication Support	✅ Yes	❌ No (only authorization)	✅ Yes
Token Format	XML	Not defined (usually opaque or JWT)	JWT (JSON Web Token)
User Info Exchange	Limited	❌ No	✅ Yes (via UserInfo endpoint)
Mobile-Friendly	❌ No	✅ Yes	✅ Yes
Logout Support	✅ Yes (SAML SLO)	❌ Not built-in	✅ Yes (`end_session_endpoint`)
Modern Adoption	Legacy/enterprise	Very common	Growing rapidly
Complexity	High (XML parsing, bindings)	Moderate	Low to moderate
Protocol Type	Web SSO protocol	Authorization framework	Identity layer over OAuth 2.0

🔄 Common Flows Compared

Flow	SAML	OAuth 2.0	OIDC
Web App Login	Redirect to IdP → SAML Response	Authorization Code Flow	Authorization Code Flow
Mobile App Login	❌ Not ideal	✅ Yes	✅ Yes
Server-to-Server Access	❌ Rare	✅ Client Credentials Flow	✅ With client credentials
User Consent	✅ Yes (built-in)	✅ Yes	✅ Yes
Token Revocation	❌ Manual	✅ Yes	✅ Yes

📊 When to Choose Which?

Scenario	Best Choice	Why
Enterprise SSO to legacy web apps	SAML	Widely supported by enterprise apps like Salesforce, Workday
Secure API access for mobile/web apps	OAuth 2.0	Focuses on secure delegated access
Modern web or mobile app login (e.g., “Login with Google”)	OpenID Connect	Provides identity information and integrates well with OAuth
Cloud-first environment (AWS, GCP, Azure)	OIDC	Native support in cloud IAM systems
B2C (Customer Identity)	OIDC	Better UX, mobile-friendly, social login support
On-premises infrastructure with Windows AD	SAML or Kerberos	Tight integration with Microsoft ecosystem

🧩 Integration Examples

1. Using SAML:

An employee logs into their corporate portal and accesses:

Salesforce

Google Workspace

AWS Console
All via SAML-based SSO through Active Directory Federation Services (AD FS) or Okta .

2. Using OAuth 2.0:

A developer builds a mobile app that needs to read the user’s calendar events from Google Calendar. The app uses OAuth 2.0 scopes to request limited access without ever seeing the user’s password.

3. Using OIDC:

A customer signs up for a new e-commerce site using “Login with Facebook” . The app receives a JWT ID token containing the user’s name and email address, then creates a local account automatically.

🛡️ Security Considerations

Factor	SAML	OAuth 2.0	OIDC
Token Expiry	Short-lived assertions	Short-lived tokens	Short-lived tokens and JWTs
Token Revocation	Manual logout required	Token revocation endpoint	Token revocation + global logout
Man-in-the-Middle Risk	Prevented via HTTPS and signed assertions	Prevented via HTTPS and bearer tokens	Prevented via HTTPS and signed JWTs
State Parameter	❌ Not applicable	✅ Used in flows to prevent CSRF	✅ Used in flows to prevent CSRF
CSRF Protection	Depends on implementation	Strong when state is used	Strong when state is used

📈 Adoption Trends

Year	SAML Usage	OAuth/OIDC Usage
2015	Dominant in enterprise	Rising in cloud/mobile
2020	Still widely used	Major growth in OIDC
2025	Declining in favor of OIDC	Dominant in modern IAM

⚠️ Many organizations are moving from SAML to OIDC due to its flexibility, ease of use, and better support for mobile and API-based systems.

📊 Summary Table

Concept	SAML	OAuth 2.0	OIDC
What It Is	XML-based SSO protocol	Authorization framework	Identity layer over OAuth
Main Use Case	Enterprise web app SSO	API access, delegated permissions	User authentication, modern SSO
Authentication	✅ Yes	❌ No	✅ Yes
Data Format	XML	Token-based (opaque/JWT)	JWT
Best For	Legacy apps, enterprise	APIs, backend services	Mobile/web apps, B2C
Logout Support	✅ With SLO	❌	✅ With`end_session_endpoint`
Mobile Friendly	❌	✅	✅

What is AWS Cognito?

☁️ Definition:

AWS Cognito is a fully managed identity service by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that enables developers to easily add user sign-up, sign-in, access control , and user management features to their web and mobile applications.

It helps you securely manage user identities , handle authentication flows, and integrate with third-party identity providers like Google, Facebook, Apple, or enterprise SAML-based systems — all without building your own identity backend.

🧠 Core Use Case:

You’re building a mobile or web app , and you want users to:

Sign up / register
Sign in / authenticate
Access protected resources securely

Instead of writing custom code for user authentication and authorization, you can use AWS Cognito to handle it all securely and scalably.

⚙️ Key Components of AWS Cognito

Component	Description
User Pools	Auser directorythat manages user registration, authentication, and account recovery. Think of it as a ready-made backend for user identity.
Identity Pools	Enablefederated identitiesfor granting temporary AWS credentials to users so they can securely access other AWS services like S3, DynamoDB, etc. Can work with User Pools, social logins, or custom auth.

🔑 Note: You can use User Pools alone , Identity Pools alone , or both together depending on your use case.

🛡️ Features of AWS Cognito

Feature	Description
User Registration & Management	Self-service sign-up, email/SMS verification, password policies
Authentication Flows	Passwordless login, MFA (multi-factor authentication), social login (Google, Facebook, Apple, etc.)
Customizable UI	Hosted sign-in pages with branding options
OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect (OIDC) Support	Integrate with third-party apps or APIs using industry-standard protocols
Federation with External IdPs	Connect with enterprise directories (via SAML) or social providers
Secure Token Management	Issues tokens for authenticated users to access AWS resources
Scalable & Serverless	Fully managed; no need to provision or maintain servers
User Groups & Role Assignment	Manage access based on groups or roles
Lambda Triggers	Customize workflows with pre/post-authentication hooks via AWS Lambda
Analytics & Monitoring	Track sign-ups, sign-ins, usage patterns

🔄 AWS Cognito Flow: How It Works

Example: Mobile App Login Using Cognito User Pool

User opens the app and clicks “Sign In”
App redirects to AWS Cognito hosted UI or uses SDK directly
User enters username/password or uses social login
Cognito authenticates the user and returns tokens:
- ID Token (JWT): Contains user identity claims
- Access Token: Grants access to authorized resources
- Refresh Token: Used to get new tokens when expired
App stores tokens securely and allows user into the app
If accessing AWS resources (e.g., S3 files), Identity Pools provide temporary AWS credentials

📌 Real-World Use Cases

Use Case	How AWS Cognito Helps
Customer-Facing Web App	Handle B2C user sign-up/sign-in with optional social login
Mobile App Authentication	Securely authenticate users and sync data across devices
Enterprise SSO Integration	Federate with Active Directory via SAML or OIDC
API Security with IAM Roles	Grant temporary AWS credentials to users accessing protected APIs
Passwordless Authentication	Send one-time codes via SMS or email for secure login
User Management at Scale	Manage millions of users without managing infrastructure

🧩 Supported Identity Providers

Type	Examples
Social Logins	Google, Facebook, Apple, Amazon
Enterprise IdPs	Azure AD, Okta, OneLogin, Shibboleth (via SAML or OIDC)
Custom Auth	Build your own identity system using Lambda triggers

📊 Comparison: AWS Cognito vs Other Identity Platforms

Feature	AWS Cognito	Auth0	Okta	Firebase Auth
Best For	AWS-centric apps	Multi-cloud/B2C	Enterprise IAM	Firebase-based apps
User Pools	✅ Yes	✅ Yes	✅ Yes	✅ Yes
Federation Support	✅ SAML, OIDC, Social	✅ Strong	✅ Strong	❌ Limited
B2C Support	✅ Good	✅ Excellent	✅ Strong	✅ Basic
Pricing Model	Pay-as-you-go	Tiered pricing	Enterprise licensing	Free tier + paid
Integration with Cloud	Deep integration with AWS	Multi-cloud	On-prem/cloud	Google Cloud
Customization	✅ With Lambda	✅ High	✅ High	✅ Moderate
MFA Support	✅ Yes	✅ Yes	✅ Yes	✅ Yes
Hosted UI	✅ Yes	✅ Yes	✅ Yes	❌ No

📦 Common Tools That Work Well with AWS Cognito

Tool/Service	Integration
Amazon API Gateway	Validate Cognito JWT tokens in API requests
AWS AppSync / GraphQL	Use Cognito for user-based data access control
Amazon S3	Grant temporary access to private buckets
AWS Amplify	Frontend framework with built-in Cognito integration
AWS Lambda	Extend functionality with triggers (pre-sign-up, post-authentication, etc.)
Amazon Pinpoint	Track user engagement and analytics
Amazon DynamoDB	Store user-specific data securely

🧪 AWS Cognito Pricing (Simplified)

Feature	Cost
First 50,000 monthly active users	Free
Beyond 50K MAUs	$0.005 per monthly active user
SMS Messages	Charged separately via Amazon SNS
Storage, API Requests, Lambda Invocations	Charged under respective AWS services

💡 This makes Cognito cost-effective for small to large-scale applications .

📊 Summary Table

Concept	Description
What is AWS Cognito?	A fully managed service for adding user authentication and identity management to apps
Main Components	User Pools (authentication), Identity Pools (authorization/federation)
Protocols Supported	OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML
Use Cases	B2C apps, mobile/web authentication, enterprise SSO, AWS resource access
Key Benefits	Scalable, secure, integrates with AWS, supports social and enterprise logins
Best For	Developers building cloud-native apps on AWS
Pricing	Starts free for up to 50K MAUs/month

Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)

🔐 Definition:

Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) is an access control model that grants permissions to users based on their roles within an organization. It simplifies permission management by grouping users into roles (e.g., Admin, HR, Developer), and assigning access rights to those roles , not individual users.

This approach ensures that users have just the right level of access they need to perform their job — no more, no less.

🧠 Core Concept: “Who Can Do What”

RBAC answers:

Who are your users?
What roles do they play in your system or organization?
What actions should each role be allowed or denied?

This makes it easier to manage access at scale compared to managing access individually for each user.

⚙️ Key Components of RBAC

Component	Description
User	An individual or system requiring access
Role	A logical grouping of access rights (e.g.,`Admin`,`Editor`,`Viewer`)
Permission	The right to perform a specific action (e.g.,`read`,`write`,`delete`) on a resource (e.g., file, database, API)
Policy	A rule that binds a role to one or more permissions

🔄 How RBAC Works – Example

Let’s say you’re managing access in a company’s internal portal:

1. Define Roles:

Admin – Can create/delete users, manage settings
HR – Can view/edit employee records
Developer – Can access development tools, deploy code
Intern – Read-only access to documentation

2. Assign Users to Roles:

Alice → HR
Bob → Developer
Charlie → Intern

3. System Enforces Access:

Alice can edit profiles but can’t deploy code.
Bob can deploy but can’t edit HR data.
Charlie can only read documentation.

✅ Benefits of RBAC

Benefit	Explanation
Simplified Access Management	Easier to assign/revoke access by changing roles instead of individual permissions
Improved Security	Ensures least privilege — users only get necessary access
Scalability	Easily manage access for hundreds or thousands of users
Compliance Friendly	Helps meet standards like GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2
Auditing & Reporting	Track what roles have access to what resources
Onboarding/Offboarding Efficiency	Assigning a role automates access provisioning/deprovisioning

📌 Real-World Examples

1. Cloud Infrastructure (AWS IAM Roles)

Developers assume a role with access to Lambda functions but not production databases.

2. Healthcare Systems

Doctors have access to patient records; nurses have limited viewing rights.

3. Enterprise SaaS Tools (Salesforce, Jira, Office 365)

Users are assigned roles like “Project Admin”, “Viewer”, or “Editor” based on job function.

4. Banking Applications

Teller roles allow deposits and withdrawals but not wire transfers.

🛡️ RBAC vs Other Access Control Models

Model	Description	Best Used For
Discretionary Access Control (DAC)	Owners control access to their own resources	Small teams or personal systems
Mandatory Access Control (MAC)	Access controlled by central policy (e.g., government classified systems)	High-security environments
Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC)	Uses dynamic attributes (location, time, device) to make decisions	Complex, fine-grained access
Policy-Based Access Control (PBAC)	Combines RBAC and ABAC using policies	Modern cloud platforms requiring flexible rules
Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)	Permissions granted based on roles	Most organizations needing scalable, structured access control

🧩 RBAC Design Patterns

Pattern	Description
Flat RBAC	All roles exist at the same level
Hierarchical RBAC	Roles inherit permissions from other roles (e.g.,`Manager`inherits from`Employee`)
Constrained RBAC	Adds separation of duties (SoD) — prevents conflicts of interest
Dynamic RBAC	Roles can be changed in real-time based on conditions or behavior

🛠 Tools That Support RBAC

Tool/Service	Use of RBAC
AWS IAM	Roles for EC2 instances, Lambda functions, users
Microsoft Azure AD	Role assignments for Azure resources (RBAC in Azure)
Google Cloud Platform (GCP)	IAM roles for cloud services
Kubernetes	Role-based access to clusters and pods
Jira / Confluence	Project roles and space permissions
Linux OS (sudoers)	Role-like permissions via groups and sudo
Okta / Auth0 / Ping Identity	Enterprise identity and access control
Salesforce	Profiles and permission sets for users

📊 Summary Table

Concept	Description
What is RBAC?	Access control model based on user roles
How it works	Users → Assigned Roles → Granted Permissions
Key Benefits	Scalable, secure, compliant, easy to audit
Best Practices	Least privilege, role inheritance, SoD enforcement
Common Implementations	AWS IAM, Azure RBAC, Kubernetes, enterprise apps
Limitations	Less flexible than ABAC/PBAC for complex conditions

🧪 Step-by-Step RBAC Implementation Plan

Here’s how to implement RBAC in your system:

Identify Resources
- List all systems, applications, APIs, files, etc., that need access control.
Define User Roles
- Create roles based on job functions (Admin, Developer, Viewer, etc.).
Assign Permissions to Roles
- Map each role to the actions it should be able to perform.
Assign Users to Roles
- Connect users to the appropriate roles based on their responsibilities.
Enforce Access Policies
- Apply RBAC rules in your application, infrastructure, or IAM system.
Audit and Review
- Regularly check role assignments and permissions for compliance and accuracy.
Automate Onboarding/Offboarding
- Integrate with HR systems or IAM tools to automatically grant/revoke access.

What is User Access Review?

🔍 Definition:

A User Access Review (UAR) is a security and compliance process that involves periodically evaluating and verifying who has access to what resources , ensuring that users have only the minimum necessary access required to perform their job functions.

It helps identify and remediate inappropriate, outdated, or excessive access rights , reducing the risk of data breaches, insider threats, and non-compliance with regulatory standards.

🧠 Why User Access Reviews Matter

User access reviews are a core part of Identity and Access Management (IAM) and are especially important in organizations that must meet regulatory requirements such as:

SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley Act)
HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act)
GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation)
ISO 27001
SOC 2
PCI-DSS

They ensure that access rights remain aligned with roles and responsibilities over time — especially when employees:

Change roles
Leave the company
Are granted temporary elevated privileges

⚙️ Key Objectives of User Access Reviews

Objective	Description
Ensure Least Privilege	Users should only have access they need to do their job
Detect Unauthorized Access	Identify accounts with inappropriate or risky permissions
Support Compliance Audits	Demonstrate that access is controlled and reviewed regularly
Reduce Insider Threats	Prevent misuse of access by former employees or overprivileged users
Improve Operational Efficiency	Streamline user provisioning/deprovisioning processes

🔄 Types of User Access Reviews

Type	Description	Frequency
Role-Based Review	Review access based on user roles (e.g., Admin, HR, Developer)	Quarterly
Resource-Based Review	Focus on who has access to specific systems, files, or apps	Varies
Manager Self-Service Review	Department managers review access for their team members	Monthly/Quarterly
Certification Campaigns	Formal campaigns where stakeholders certify access	Annually or per audit cycle
Automated Review	Tools automatically flag anomalies or stale access	Continuous or scheduled

📋 Example: Real-World User Access Review Scenario

A financial services company performs quarterly access reviews.

The IT team generates a report listing all users with access to the customer database.

Managers review the list and confirm whether each user still needs access.

Any unnecessary access is revoked.

The results are documented for an upcoming SOC 2 audit.

🛡️ Best Practices for Conducting User Access Reviews

Practice	Explanation
Define Clear Roles & Permissions	Use Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) to standardize access
Involve Business Owners	Have department heads validate access for their teams
Use Automation Tools	Automate access certification, reporting, and revocation
Review Stale Accounts	Remove access for inactive or offboarded users
Document Everything	Keep logs for audits and compliance reporting
Integrate with IAM Systems	Connect with Active Directory, SaaS apps, cloud platforms
Perform Regular Reviews	Schedule quarterly or semi-annual reviews at minimum

🧩 Who Should Be Involved?

Stakeholder	Role
IT Security Team	Initiate and manage the review process
Application Owners	Confirm access for their system or app
Department Managers	Certify access for their direct reports
Compliance Officer	Ensure alignment with regulatory standards
HR Team	Provide updates on employee status changes (hires, transfers, exits)

📊 Common Tools Used for Access Reviews

Tool	Type	Features
SailPoint IdentityIQ	Enterprise IAM	Automated access reviews, role management
Okta Identity Governance	Cloud IAM	Workflow-driven access certifications
OneIdentity (formerly Dell)	IAM Suite	RBAC and access governance tools
Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD) Entitlement Management	Cloud IAM	Access reviews, role-based access
AWS IAM Access Analyzer	Cloud Security	Detects unintended resource access
Google Workspace Admin Console	SaaS	Review user access to Google apps
Custom Scripts + Excel Reports	Manual Approach	For small teams without IAM tools

📌 Step-by-Step Guide to Conducting a User Access Review

Step 1: Plan the Scope

Decide which systems, applications, or roles to review
Set a timeline and assign reviewers

Step 2: Gather Access Data

Export user access lists from IAM systems, directories, databases, etc.
Group users by role, department, or application

Step 3: Distribute for Review

Send reports to managers or application owners
Use automated tools to request approvals/certifications

Step 4: Analyze Results

Identify unused, excessive, or inappropriate access
Flag discrepancies for further investigation

Step 5: Remediate Issues

Revoke unnecessary access
Update role definitions if needed

Step 6: Document and Report

Record findings and actions taken
Prepare documentation for auditors or compliance officers

✅ Benefits Summary

Benefit	Explanation
Security Improvement	Reduces attack surface by eliminating unnecessary access
Regulatory Compliance	Helps meet audit requirements
Operational Efficiency	Simplifies access management and reduces helpdesk tickets
Cost Savings	Avoids fines and reduces manual overhead
Improved Visibility	Gives clear insight into who has access to what

📊 Summary Table

Concept	Description
What is UAR?	Process to verify and manage user access rights
Purpose	Ensure least privilege, detect unauthorized access, support compliance
Who Does It?	IT, security, compliance, and business managers
How Often?	At least quarterly; more frequently for high-risk systems
Tools Used	IAM platforms like SailPoint, Okta, Azure AD, AWS IAM
Best Practices	Use RBAC, automate reviews, document everything, involve stakeholders

What is System Account Access Review?

🔐 Definition:

A System Account Access Review is a security and compliance process that periodically evaluates and verifies which system-level accounts (non-human identities) have access to what resources, applications, or infrastructure. This ensures that only authorized and necessary system accounts are active and have appropriate permissions.

These accounts — such as service accounts, application accounts, automation bots, privileged accounts, and machine identities — often have elevated privileges , making them high-risk targets for attackers.

🧠 Why It Matters

System accounts are widely used across IT environments to:

Run background services
Automate workflows
Integrate between systems
Perform scheduled tasks

Because they typically operate without human interaction, they can go unnoticed for long periods — leading to:

Overprivileged access
Stale or orphaned accounts
Lack of accountability
Increased risk of misuse or compromise

A single misconfigured service account with excessive permissions can lead to data breaches, privilege escalation attacks, or lateral movement in a network.

⚙️ Types of System Accounts

Type	Description	Example
Service Accounts	Used by applications or services to run under a specific identity	SQL Server Agent, Apache Web Server
Application Accounts	Used by apps to connect to databases or APIs	App-to-database connection user
Automation/Bot Accounts	Used by scripts or automated tools	CI/CD pipelines, backup jobs
Privileged/Superuser Accounts	High-rights accounts like`root`,`Administrator`, or domain admins	Linux root, Windows Administrator
Machine Identities	Certificates or keys used by machines to authenticate	TLS/SSL certificates, SSH keys

🔄 Objectives of System Account Access Reviews

Objective	Description
Ensure Least Privilege	Accounts should only have the minimum permissions needed
Detect Stale or Unused Accounts	Identify and disable unused or outdated system accounts
Remove Overprivileged Accounts	Revoke unnecessary admin rights
Prevent Misuse or Compromise	Reduce attack surface from high-risk accounts
Support Compliance Requirements	Meet standards like SOX, HIPAA, ISO 27001, NIST, etc.
Improve Accountability	Ensure ownership is assigned and documented

📋 Example: Real-World Scenario

An organization uses several service accounts to run internal tools.

During a system account review:

One service account was found running a deprecated app with domain admin privileges

Another had not been used in over 6 months

A third had write access to sensitive financial data it didn’t need

The security team revoked unnecessary privileges, disabled stale accounts, and reassigned ownership where missing.

🛡️ Best Practices for Conducting System Account Reviews

Practice	Explanation
Maintain an Inventory	Keep a centralized list of all system accounts and their purpose
Assign Ownership	Each system account should have a clear owner responsible for its use
Document Purpose & Scope	Record what each account does and which systems it accesses
Review Permissions Regularly	Ensure accounts don’t have more access than needed
Automate Detection of Inactive Accounts	Use IAM tools or scripts to flag dormant accounts
Rotate Credentials Periodically	Change passwords or API keys on a schedule
Use Just-In-Time (JIT) Access Where Possible	Grant elevated access only when needed
Audit and Report Findings	Document reviews for compliance and audit purposes

🧩 Who Should Be Involved?

Stakeholder	Role
IT Operations Team	Manage and maintain system accounts
Security Team	Monitor for risks and enforce policies
Compliance Officer	Ensure alignment with regulatory requirements
Application Owners	Justify the need for specific service accounts
IAM / Identity Governance Team	Coordinate and automate access reviews

📊 Common Tools Used for System Account Reviews

Tool	Type	Features
Microsoft Entra ID / Azure AD	Cloud IAM	Review service principals, managed identities
AWS IAM	Cloud Security	Audit roles, policies, and service accounts
Okta Identity Governance	IAM Platform	Automate access certification for system accounts
SailPoint IdentityIQ	Enterprise IAM	Govern non-human identities and entitlements
BeyondTrust / CyberArk	Privileged Access Management (PAM)	Discover and manage privileged system accounts
Linux/Windows Logs + Scripts	Manual Approach	For small teams without IAM tools
SIEM Tools (Splunk, QRadar)	Log Analysis	Detect anomalies in system account behavior

📌 Step-by-Step Guide to Conducting a System Account Access Review

Step 1: Create an Inventory

List all system accounts across servers, databases, cloud platforms, and apps
Include: name, type, owner, last login, permissions, purpose

Step 2: Categorize Accounts

By function (e.g., database connector, scheduler)
By privilege level (standard vs privileged)
By environment (dev, test, production)

Step 3: Assess Access Rights

Check what resources each account has access to
Look for overprivileged accounts (e.g., admin rights not needed)

Step 4: Identify Stale or Unused Accounts

Flag accounts inactive for 90+ days
Investigate whether they’re still needed

Step 5: Verify Ownership

Confirm who is responsible for each account
If none, escalate or deprovision

Step 6: Remediate Issues

Disable unused accounts
Revoke unnecessary permissions
Rotate credentials if compromised or expired

Step 7: Document and Report

Record findings and actions taken
Prepare documentation for auditors or compliance officers

✅ Benefits Summary

Benefit	Explanation
Improved Security	Reduces risk of unauthorized access and privilege abuse
Regulatory Compliance	Helps meet audit requirements
Operational Efficiency	Streamlines account management and reduces clutter
Cost Savings	Avoids fines and reduces manual overhead
Better Visibility	Clear insight into system-level access and usage

📊 Summary Table

Concept	Description
What is System Account Access Review?	Evaluating and managing system-level accounts and their access rights
Why Do It?	Reduce risk, ensure least privilege, support compliance
Who Does It?	IT, security, compliance, and application owners
How Often?	At least quarterly; more frequently for privileged accounts
Tools Used	IAM platforms, PAM tools, cloud consoles, SIEMs
Best Practices	Maintain inventory, rotate secrets, assign ownership, document everything

What is Provisioning and Deprovisioning?

🔐 Definition:

Provisioning and deprovisioning are key processes in Identity and Access Management (IAM) that involve automating the creation, management, and removal of user accounts and access rights across systems, applications, and infrastructure.

These processes ensure that users have the right level of access at the right time , and that access is revoked promptly when no longer needed — helping maintain security, compliance, and operational efficiency.

🧠 Core Concepts

Term	Description
Provisioning	The process ofcreating and configuring user accounts and access rightswhen a user joins or changes roles within an organization.
Deprovisioning	The process ofremoving or disabling user accounts and revoking access rightswhen a user leaves or changes roles.

These processes apply to both human identities (employees, contractors) and non-human identities (service accounts, bots, automation tools).

⚙️ Why Provisioning & Deprovisioning Matter

Without proper provisioning and deprovisioning:

Users may have too much access (violating least privilege)
Offboarded employees may still retain access (posing security risks )
IT teams spend too much time manually managing access
Organizations fail compliance audits (e.g., SOX, HIPAA, GDPR)

They are essential for:

Security
Compliance
Operational Efficiency
User Experience

🔄 User Lifecycle and IAM Processes

[Onboarding]

↓

[Provisioning: Create account, assign role-based access]

↓

[Access Review: Periodically review permissions]

↓

[Role Change / Offboarding]

↓

[Deprovisioning: Remove or disable account and access]

📋 Example Scenario

A new employee joins as a Marketing Associate.

HR system triggers provisioning workflow

IAM system creates their email, Active Directory account, and SaaS app access (Slack, Google Workspace, HubSpot)

They’re assigned the “Marketing” role with appropriate permissions

Six months later, they leave the company.

HR system marks them as offboarded

IAM system automatically disables their account and removes access from all apps

Their mailbox is archived and access revoked

🛠️ Types of Provisioning

Type	Description	Use Case
Manual Provisioning	Admin manually creates accounts and assigns access	Small organizations without IAM tools
Self-Service Provisioning	Users request access via portal/approval workflows	Service desks, internal app requests
Automated Provisioning	Connected to HR or IAM systems; access is auto-created based on role	Enterprise environments
Just-In-Time (JIT) Provisioning	Accounts created only when user logs in (federated login)	Cloud apps using SAML/OIDC

🧩 Provisioning Workflow Steps

User Onboarding
- Trigger from HR system (e.g., Workday, SAP SuccessFactors)
Create Identity
- User account in directory (Active Directory, Azure AD)
Assign Roles & Permissions
- Based on job function (RBAC), department, location
Grant Access to Systems
- Email, cloud apps (Salesforce, Office 365), databases, APIs
Notify Stakeholders
- IT, manager, helpdesk informed of successful provisioning

🧨 Deprovisioning Workflow Steps

User Offboarding
- Trigger from HR system or manual request
Revoke Access
- Disable account, remove from groups/roles
Remove System Access
- Revoke access to apps, data, cloud services
Archive Data
- Email, files, documents stored securely
Audit Trail
- Log who was deprovisioned and when

🛡️ Best Practices

Practice	Explanation
Integrate with HR Systems	Automate provisioning/deprovisioning based on employment status
Use Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)	Assign permissions based on roles instead of individuals
Enable Just-In-Time (JIT) Access	Reduce standing privileges by granting access only when needed
Automate Where Possible	Reduce errors and save time with automated workflows
Log and Audit All Actions	Maintain records for compliance and forensic analysis
Review Stale Accounts Regularly	Ensure old accounts don’t linger after deprovisioning
Support Self-Service Requests	Let users request access with approval workflows
Monitor for Anomalies	Detect failed logins or unauthorized access attempts post-deprovisioning

🧪 Common Tools for Provisioning & Deprovisioning

Tool	Type	Features
Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD)	Cloud IAM	Automated provisioning/deprovisioning for SaaS apps
Okta Lifecycle Management	IAM Platform	Sync with HR systems, automate user lifecycle
OneLogin Lifecycle Actions	IAM Platform	User provisioning workflows
SailPoint IdentityNow	Identity Governance	RBAC-based provisioning with audit trail
AWS IAM Identity Center (SSO)	Cloud IAM	Centralized identity and access control
Google Workspace Admin Console	SaaS	Manage user lifecycle across G Suite apps
Custom Scripts + LDAP/APIs	Manual Approach	For small teams without IAM tools

📊 Summary Table

Concept	Description
What is Provisioning?	Creating accounts and assigning access when users join or change roles
What is Deprovisioning?	Removing or disabling accounts and access when users leave or change roles
Why It’s Important	Ensures least privilege, reduces risk, supports compliance
Best Practices	Integrate with HR, use RBAC, automate, audit
Tools Used	Azure AD, Okta, SailPoint, AWS IAM, Google Workspace
Benefits	Improved security, faster onboarding/offboarding, reduced audit risk